Gian Matias Di Natale vs Pietro Marino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L W W L L
Form
W W L W W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Natale 1 - 1 Marino
They have played 6 sets in total, with Natale winning 3 and Marino winning 3. The last match between Natale and Marino was at the M25 Santa Margherita di Pula, 23-04-2024, First, Clay with Pietro Marino getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gian Matias Di Natale | 1 |
| Pietro Marino | 1 |
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula(23-04-2024)
2
6
6
4
6
3
| Natale | Stats | Marino |
|---|---|---|
| 36% (4-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (20-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| N/A | Ranking | 834 |
| Highest Rank | 827 | |
| 27 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 47% (86-98) | Career Total W/L | 58% (159-113) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Pietro Marino
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
Pietro Marino
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 29 | Games Won | 24 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:18:30 | Average Match Time | 2:18:30 |
| 58% (87/151) | 1st Serve % | 68% (114/168) |
| 67% (58/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (63/114) |
| 42% (27/64) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (25/54) |
| 55% (12/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (10/15) |
| 48% (80/168) | Return Points Win % | 44% (66/151) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gian Matias Di Natale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
9
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
42%
(
47 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(6) 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
Bruno Pujol Navarro
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(1) 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Pietro Marino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Schifris
Player
Pietro Marino
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve %
60%
(
6 of
10)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
7 of
12)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
12
Total Points Won
14
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Beauge
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
82%
(
42 of
51)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
47
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tadeas Paroulek
Player
Pietro Marino
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Kai Wehnelt
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Josh Roe Flannelly
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47% (86/98) | Win/Loss | 58% (159/113) |
| 49% (201/211) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (350/267) |
| 50% (1952/1927) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3109/2743) |
| 37% (7/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (69/42) |
| 49% (74/78) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (88/67) |
| 38% (5/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 114 | Aces Total | 230 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 274 | Total Double Faults | 304 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:3:28 |
| 243.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 318.46 |
| 61% (3710/6067) | 1st Serve % | 67% (7225/10718) |
| 62% (2309/3710) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (4375/7225) |
| 47% (1105/2357) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1663/3493) |
| 45% (278/618) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (555/1267) |
| 41% (2473/5974) | Return Points Win % | 43% (4692/10987) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 48% (85/93) | Futures W/L | 59% (159/112) |
| 47% (86/183) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (156/268) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (16/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (35/59) |
| 36% (16/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (42/77) |
| 83% (94/78) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (160/138) |
| 17% (94/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (160/22) |
| 9% (90/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (112/21) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
